World

Crufts winner's £1.1m will sparks court battle between son and kennel hand

Crufts winner's £1.1m will sparks court battle between son and kennel hand

By Fatma Younis

The £1.1 million will of Mary Swash, a renowned Airedale terrier breeder who won best in show at Crufts in 1986, is the subject of a High Court dispute between her son John Cartledge and her longtime kennel hand David Brand.

Background

Mary Swash established her Jokyl kennels in 1959 on a farm in West Tisted, Hampshire. Her bitch Ginger Christmas Carol, known as Emma, took the best-in-show prize at Crufts in 1986. David Brand, 59, lived and worked at the kennels for 34 years, caring for the dogs and later assisting with Swash's care until her death at age 89 in July 2025.

The Will and Claims

Swash's 2008 will left £100,000 to Brand and the remainder of her £1.1 million estate — mainly the farm valued at £1.1 million plus £70,000 cash — to her only son John Cartledge, 63, who runs a pet services business in Bracknell. Brand argues he was treated as family and promised lifelong provision. He lodged a caveat in January 2026 and is claiming "reasonable provision" under the 1975 Inheritance Act, asserting he was dependent on Swash.

Court Hearing

At a hearing before Deputy Master Michael Jefferis, Brand's barrister George Woodhead requested either a £50,000 lump sum or £865 monthly from the estate until trial next year, stating Brand has no money for food or dog care by winter. Cartledge's barrister Luke Harris said his client had been paying £350 monthly plus £1,500 for estate expenses and offered a £300,000 house for life plus the £100,000 legacy. Cartledge also emailed that he would ensure Brand lives comfortably.

Judge's Interim Ruling

Master Jefferis accepted Cartledge's undertaking to increase monthly payments to £850, plus the £1,500 for estate and dog expenses. The judge found a strong claim and immediate need, noting the informal 34-year arrangement and Swash's statements about providing a home for Brand. However, he questioned why Brand cannot seek other work or why the estate dogs cannot be sold. The case proceeds to trial next year.

Share this article: