By Sohaib Shams
An unnamed celebrity is seeking a High Court injunction to prevent ITN and Guardian News and Media from publishing his identity and allegations that he abused his status for years to engage in "inappropriate sexual activities with a large number of girls and young women." The two-day trial began Tuesday in London, with the man referred to in court as PPT.
Suicide Risk Argument
The celebrity's legal team told the court that publication would be "highly likely" to lead him to kill himself, arguing his drastic reaction stems from fear of "trial by media" rather than any wrongdoing. Barrister Sara Mansoori KC said the man attempted suicide twice after receiving letters from the news organizations requesting his response to the allegations, and has been hospitalized for months under involuntary detention, examined by more than 10 doctors.
Media Organizations Argue Public Interest
Gavin Millar KC, representing ITN and GNM, said reporters spoke to more than 100 people during a "wide-ranging and rigorous investigation" that revealed a "pattern of behaviour." He argued there is a "strong" public interest in publishing the allegations, noting many women "have been traumatised by the claimant's alleged conduct and have suffered mental health crises and mental illness as a result." Millar contended that preventing publication would require the state to intervene in "lawful journalistic activities."
Judge Warns Against Speculation
Mr Justice Nicklin acknowledged "significant public interest" in the proceedings but emphasized the court will determine only whether the allegations can be published, not their truth. He urged the press and public not to speculate about the man's identity, stating: "The existence of online speculation, however confidently expressed or widely repeated, does not authorise anyone to identify, or purport authoritatively to identify, PPT in connection with these proceedings."
Medical Evidence and Next Steps
A medical report prepared for the court said inpatient treatment could provide "significant, but not complete mitigation of the risk" and had "a realistic potential to reduce the risk" over a period of months. The judge said the case is "difficult and important" and must be determined fairly on the evidence and legal submissions.
