By Sohaib Shams
A High Court judge has denied a celebrity's request for a permanent injunction to block two news organisations from publishing his identity and allegations of sexual misconduct, but a temporary anonymity order will remain in force while the claimant considers an appeal.
Judge Rejects Permanent Injunction
Mr Justice Nicklin ruled on Tuesday that the claim for a permanent injunction was dismissed. The judge emphasised that the court did not determine the truth of the allegations, and the dismissal does not constitute approval of any future publication by ITN and the Guardian.
Temporary Anonymity Order Extended
The existing reporting restrictions preventing identification of the man and publication of the allegations will stay in place to allow time for an appeal. The claimant must lodge grounds for appeal by 16:30 GMT on 9 November.
Public Interest Arguments
Lawyers for ITN and the Guardian argued there is a strong public interest in publishing their investigation, which alleges the celebrity abused his status to engage in inappropriate sexual activities with a large number of girls and young women. The judge agreed the subject matter includes alleged abuse of power and sexual misconduct toward younger or vulnerable persons, capable of contributing significantly to public debate.
Human Rights Claims Rejected
The celebrity argued publication would breach his rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, including the right to life and protection from inhuman treatment, citing a history of suicide attempts linked to media pressure. The judge accepted publication would cause acute mental suffering but found no legal obligation to prevent that suffering by restraining publication, and rejected the claim that a permanent injunction was required to protect his right to life.
Appeal Deadline Set
Sara Mansoori KC, representing the celebrity, said her client is in a highly vulnerable position and has not been able to give instructions on an appeal. The temporary order remains legally binding, making it an offence to identify the man or publish details that could lead to identification.
